Sonner vs emre-toast: Which Toast Library Should You Choose?

Both Sonner and emre-toast are solid choices. The right pick depends on your product shape, especially if you care about real-time updates and interaction-heavy notification UX.

Quick Decision Matrix

| Capability | Sonner | emre-toast | | --- | --- | --- | | Simple React toast API | Yes | Yes | | Streaming-focused live updates | Limited | Strong default | | Stacked perspective + expand-on-hover | No | Yes | | Undo countdown pattern | No native pattern | Built-in | | Movable toasts | No | Yes | | Runtime dependencies | Depends on Radix stack | Zero runtime deps |

Where Sonner Wins

• You are fully standardized on shadcn defaults and want minimal surface change.
• Your notification needs are straightforward and mostly static.
• You prefer to stay close to the Radix ecosystem conventions.

Where emre-toast Wins

• You are building AI, agentic, or streaming-heavy product flows.
• You want premium stack behavior under burst traffic.
• You need richer interaction patterns (undo windows, movable stacks, grouped updates).
• You want low integration overhead with zero runtime dependencies.

Migration Notes (Sonner -> emre-toast)

Migration is usually quick:

1. Mount EmreToaster once in your app layout.
2. Replace toast.* calls with emreToast.*.
3. Enable stack behavior (expand, closeButton, movable) where needed.

Final Recommendation

If your app is mostly standard dashboard UX, Sonner remains a good default. If your app depends on fast, real-time, and high-signal feedback loops, emre-toast gives you a stronger product edge.